Can Federal Funding from the Inflation Reduction Act Be Taken Back?

/

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022 represents one of the most ambitious efforts by the U.S. federal government to tackle climate change, expand renewable energy, and promote economic growth through targeted investments. With billions of dollars allocated to states, municipalities, tribal governments, and private entities, questions often arise about the durability of this funding. One of the most pressing concerns is whether federal funding provided under the IRA can be “taken back” by the federal government. The answer depends on several factors, including the terms of the grant or funding agreement and compliance with program requirements.

Understanding Federal Funding Dynamics

Federal funding, including funding provided under the IRA, typically follows a structured process. Recipients must meet specific eligibility requirements, comply with regulations, and use the funds for their intended purposes. This structure ensures accountability and the effective use of taxpayer dollars.

The process of federal government reclaiming funds, known as “recoupment,” can occur in specific circumstances, including:

  • Noncompliance with Grant Terms: If a recipient fails to adhere to the terms and conditions outlined in the grant agreement, such as misusing funds or failing to meet project milestones, the federal agency may seek to recover the funds.

  • Audit Findings: Federal programs are subject to regular audits to ensure compliance and proper fund usage. The government may require repayment if an audit reveals mismanagement, overpayment, or ineligible expenditures.

  • Fraud or Misrepresentation: Instances of intentional fraud, such as providing false information during the application process or misreporting project outcomes, can lead to the reclamation of funds and potential legal consequences.

  • Policy or Legislative Changes: While rare, shifts in federal priorities or changes to the legislation underpinning the IRA could impact funding availability. However, clawing back already-disbursed funds through legislative changes is complex and legally challenging.

Protections for IRA Funding Recipients

Recipients of IRA funding can take proactive steps to minimize the risk of recoupment and ensure compliance:

  1. Adherence to Guidelines: Carefully reviewing and following the program’s guidelines, reporting requirements, and performance metrics is essential.

  2. Robust Record-Keeping: Maintaining detailed records of how funds are used can protect against audit findings and demonstrate compliance.

  3. Transparency and Communication: Regularly communicating with the administering federal agency can help resolve potential issues before they escalate.

The Role of Oversight and Accountability

Federal agencies administering IRA funds—such as the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)—are tasked with ensuring accountability. While oversight mechanisms are designed to protect public resources, they are not intended to create undue burdens for recipients acting in good faith. Agencies often provide technical assistance and guidance to help recipients meet program requirements.

Note: If federal agencies experience significant staff reductions or resource constraints, the availability of assistance with grant guidance may take substantially longer, potentially causing delays for recipients seeking help.

The Popularity and Complexity of Direct Pay

Direct pay has been a popular topic among members of the Midwest Climate Collaborative. While it is highly unlikely that direct pay provisions will be removed—given the complexity of altering the tax code—the federal government could make accessing assistance for direct pay more challenging. This could be done by complicating the reporting and compliance processes, thereby creating additional administrative hurdles for recipients.

Legislative Safeguards

The IRA’s funding provisions were designed to provide long-term certainty for recipients, particularly as the law aims to drive significant investments in clean energy and infrastructure. Once funds are appropriated and disbursed, reversing these allocations becomes legally and politically complicated. This ensures that recipients can proceed with projects without fear of sudden funding withdrawal, barring issues of noncompliance or malfeasance.

Conclusion

While federal funding under the Inflation Reduction Act comes with strings attached, the risk of funds being “taken back” is generally tied to specific circumstances such as noncompliance or mismanagement. Recipients who follow program guidelines, maintain transparency, and uphold accountability standards are well-positioned to retain their funding and achieve their project goals.

As with any federal program, due diligence and adherence to best practices are the keys to success. However, recipients should be mindful of potential administrative delays in receiving assistance and the possibility of increased complexity in processes like direct pay, which may require additional resources to navigate effectively.

KERAMIDA’s professionals are experts in supporting local governments in Climate Action Planning. For more information on how we can assist you, contact us or call (800) 508-8034 to speak with one of our Sustainability professionals today.

Author

Amber Greaney, MPA, LEED GA, ENV SP
Senior Sustainability Manager
KERAMIDA Inc.

Contact Amber at agreaney@keramida.com

Related Services

Related Case Studies